Tropical forests containing ~50% of the aboveground carbon in global vegetation, have been experiencing intense pressure from land use changes such as deforestation and degradation. However, substantial uncertainty remains in estimating tropical forest carbon emissions from those human activities. Therefore, quantifying the uncertainty of the aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon stock is crucial for understanding the global carbon cycle and implementing the United Nations Program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD).
In a study recently published on Remote Sensing of Environment a team of authors (the authors, CMCC researchers G. Vaglio Laurin and R. Valentini from IAFES Division) proposed a new method of quantifying errors of remotely sensed AGB.

The abstract of the paper:
Quantifying the uncertainty of the aboveground biomass (AGB) and carbon (C) stock is crucial for understanding the global C cycle and implementing the United Nations Program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD). The uncertainty analysis of remotely sensed AGB is tricky because, if validation plots or cross-validation is used for error assessment, the AGB of validation plots does not necessarily represent the actual measurements but estimates of the true AGB. Leveraging a recently published pan-tropical destructively measured tree AGB database, this study proposed a new method of characterizing the uncertainty of the remotely sensed AGB. The method propagates errors from tree- to landscape-level by considering errors in the whole workflow of the AGB mapping process, including allometric model development, tree measurements, tree-level AGB prediction, plot-level AGB estimation, plot-level remote sensing based biomass model development, remote sensing feature extraction, and pixel-level AGB prediction. Applying such a method to the tree AGB mapped using airborne lidar over tropical forests in Ghana, we found that the AGB prediction error is over 20% at 1 ha spatial resolution, larger than the results reported in previous studies for other tropical forests. The discrepancy between our studies and others reflects not only our focus on African tropical forests but also the methodological differences in our uncertainty analysis, especially in the aspect of comprehensively addressing more sources of uncertainty. This study also highlights the importance of considering the plot-level AGB estimate uncertainty when field plots are used to calibrate remote sensing based biomass models.

Read the full version of the paper:
Chen Q., Vaglio Laurin G., Valentini R.

Uncertainty of remotely sensed aboveground biomass over an African tropical forest: Propagating errors from trees to plots to pixels
2015, Remote Sensing of Environment, in press, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.009