This paper investigates the potential contribution of forestry management in meeting a CO2 stabilization policy of 550 ppmv by 2100. In order to assess the optimal response of the carbon market to forest sequestration we couple two global models. An energy-economy- climate model for the study of climate policies is linked with a detailed forestry model through an iterative procedure to provide the optimal abatement strategy. Results show that forestry is a determinant abatement option and could lead to significantly lower policy costs if included. Linking forestry management to the carbon market has the potential to alleviate the policy burden of 50ppmv or equivalently of 1⁄4 of °C, and to significantly decrease the price of carbon. Biological sequestration will mostly come from avoided deforestation in tropical forests rich countries. The inclusion of this mitigation option is demonstrated to crowd out some of the traditional abatement in the energy sector and to lessen induced technological change in clean technologies.

• issn: Q23, Q52, Q55

• European Institute on Economics and the Environment

• Economic analysis of Climate Impacts and Policy Division

Authors

• Massimo Tavoni
• Brent Sohngen
• Valentina Bosetti